Home>>Ultrasonography-guided amniocentesis in singleton pregnancies: a review of the first 1,000 cases.

Search

About

Authors:
Address: Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, College of Medicine, University of Lagos, Idi-Araba, Lagos, Nigeria. prenataldiagnosiscentre@hotmail.com
Journal:


Publication:


abstract

OBJECTIVE:

To assess factors that might influence the success rate, safety and reliability of amniocentesis.

DESIGN:

A retrospective study analyzing of the outcome of the first 1,000 cases of amniocenteses.

SETTING:

The outpatient clinic of prenatal diagnosis and therapy laboratory of a University tertiary care centre.

METHOD AND MATERIAL:

A review of the first 1,000 amniocentesis procedures performed at the Prenatal Diagnosis and Therapy Centre is presented. Medical records were reviewed for maternal age, indication, color of amniotic fluid, gestational age, frequency of needle insertion, complications of amniocentesis, pre delivery results of prenatal testing and pregnancy outcome. Complete follow-up data were available for 968 (96.8%), and in 42 cases reports were not complete.

RESULTS:

There were 21 miscarriages before 28 weeks of gestation (2.2%), three losses after 28 weeks (0.3%) and six stillbirths (0.6%) (4 due to infections) resulting in a total post procedural loss rate of 3.1% (30). Miscarriage within two weeks of amniocentesis occurred in six patients (0.62%).

CONCLUSION:

Amniocentesis is a relatively safe and reliable method of prenatal diagnosis. It must be done by experienced personnel.



Related Articles
Ultrasonography-guided early amniocentesis in singleton pregnancies.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990
Ultrasonography-guided early amniocentesis in singleton pregnancies.
Hanson FW, Happ RL, Tennant FR, Hune S, Peterson AG. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Jun; 162(6):1376-81; discussion 1381-3.
The loss rates for invasive prenatal testing in a specialised obstetric ultrasound practice.
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002
The loss rates for invasive prenatal testing in a specialised obstetric ultrasound practice.
Scott F, Peters H, Boogert T, Robertson R, Anderson J, McLennan A, Kesby G, Edelman D. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002 Feb; 42(1):55-8.
Analysis of 2136 genetic amniocenteses: experience of a single physician.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985
Analysis of 2136 genetic amniocenteses: experience of a single physician.
Hanson FW, Tennant FR, Zorn EM, Samuels S. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985 Jun 15; 152(4):436-43.
Review Diagnostic mid trimester amniocentesis: how safe?
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004
Review Diagnostic mid trimester amniocentesis: how safe?
Seeds JW. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Aug; 191(2):607-15.
Review Incidence of abortion after genetic amniocentesis in twin pregnancies.
Prenat Diagn. 1991
Review Incidence of abortion after genetic amniocentesis in twin pregnancies.
Pruggmayer M, Baumann P, Schütte H, Osmers R, Bartels I, Jovanovich V, Rauskolb R. Prenat Diagn. 1991 Aug; 11(8):637-40.