
Search
Publication:
abstract
OBJECTIVE:
To compare thulium:YAG laser-assisted Transoral robotic surgery (TY:TORS) and conventional electrocautery-equipped TORS (EC:TORS) in patients undergoing transoral resection of upper aerodigestive tract malignant neoplasms.
DESIGN:
prospective matched cohort study.
SETTING:
Tertiary academic referral center.
PATIENTS:
Fifteen patients undergoing TY:TORS were matched on the basis of tumor site, clinical T stage, sex, and age with 30 control subjects undergoing EC:TORS.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:
The primary outcome was a comparison between the feasibility of TY:TORS compared with EC:TORS. The secondary outcome was a comparison between the safety and functional outcome of TY:TORS compared with EC:TORS in patients undergoing resection of upper aerodigestive tract malignant neoplasms.
RESULTS:
All the tumors underwent complete excision with negative margins. Estimated blood loss was minimal (<150 mL) for 87% of TY:TORS patients (13 of 15) and 63% of EC:TORS controls (19 or 30). Intraoperative pharyngotomy was reported in 8% of TY:TORS patients (1 of 13) and 42% of EC:TORS controls (11 of 30) (P = .03). Postoperative pain was greater in EC:TORS compared with TY:TORS (P = .02). No statistically significant differences were noted in hemostasis, postoperative bleeding rates, or other complications.
CONCLUSIONS:
Compared with EC:TORS, TY:TORS seems feasible and safe. In addition, TY:TORS resulted in fewer intraoperative pharyngotomies and less postoperative pain than did EC:TORS, which may be because of decreased collateral thermal damage, improved visualization, and finer cutting using the thulium laser.
Related Articles
Outcomes of transoral robotic surgery: a preliminary clinical experience.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011
Outcomes of transoral robotic surgery: a preliminary clinical experience.
Hurtuk A, Agrawal A, Old M, Teknos TN, Ozer E. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011 Aug; 145(2):248-53.
Implementation of a TORS program in an academic medical center.
Laryngoscope. 2011
Implementation of a TORS program in an academic medical center.
Richmon JD, Agrawal N, Pattani KM. Laryngoscope. 2011 Nov; 121(11):2344-8. Epub 2011 Oct 12.
Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) for base of tongue neoplasms.
Laryngoscope. 2006
Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) for base of tongue neoplasms.
O'Malley BW Jr, Weinstein GS, Snyder W, Hockstein NG. Laryngoscope. 2006 Aug; 116(8):1465-72.
Review A shifting paradigm for patients with head and neck cancer: transoral robotic surgery (TORS).
Oncology (Williston Park). 2010
Review A shifting paradigm for patients with head and neck cancer: transoral robotic surgery (TORS).
Bhayani MK, Holsinger FC, Lai SY. Oncology (Williston Park). 2010 Oct; 24(11):1010-5.
Review Thulium: YAG 2 mum cw laser prostatectomy: where do we stand?
World J Urol. 2010
Review Thulium: YAG 2 mum cw laser prostatectomy: where do we stand?
Bach T, Xia SJ, Yang Y, Mattioli S, Watson GM, Gross AJ, Herrmann TR. World J Urol. 2010 Apr; 28(2):163-8. Epub 2010 Mar 5.
