Publication:


abstract

OBJECTIVE:

The purpose of this article is to examine the demographic, health, and social characteristics of mobility device users in long-term care settings.

METHODS:

Data were used from a recently institutionalized sample of older adults from the Canadian Study of Health and Aging. Multinomial logistic regression was used to examine the factors associated with the use of different mobility devices (cane, walker, or wheelchair).

RESULTS:

Over 70% used mobility aids (over 50% used a wheelchair). Mobility limitations were strongly associated with the use of mobility devices. However, among those with mobility limitations, educational resources reduced the odds of wheelchair use.

CONCLUSIONS:

Consistent with findings from the community setting, need factors are strongly associated with the use of mobility aids in institutions. However, socioeconomic resources may provide older adults with alternate ways to manage mobility limitations in institutional settings.

Related Articles
Maintaining functional independence in elderly adults: the roles of health status and financial resources in predicting home modifications and use of mobility equipment.
Gerontologist. 2002
Maintaining functional independence in elderly adults: the roles of health status and financial resources in predicting home modifications and use of mobility equipment.
Mathieson KM, Kronenfeld JJ, Keith VM. Gerontologist. 2002 Feb; 42(1):24-31.
Changes in the use of assistive devices among 90-year-old persons.
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2005
Changes in the use of assistive devices among 90-year-old persons.
Ivanoff SD, Sonn U. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2005 Jun; 17(3):246-51.
Wheelchair use among community-dwelling older adults: Prevalence and risk factors in a national sample.
Can J Aging. 2005
Wheelchair use among community-dwelling older adults: Prevalence and risk factors in a national sample.
Clarke P, Colantonio A. Can J Aging. 2005 Summer; 24(2):191-8.
Review Mobility devices to promote activity and participation: a systematic review.
J Rehabil Med. 2009
Review Mobility devices to promote activity and participation: a systematic review.
Salminen AL, Brandt A, Samuelsson K, Töytäri O, Malmivaara A. J Rehabil Med. 2009 Sep; 41(9):697-706.
Review Assistive devices for balance and mobility: benefits, demands, and adverse consequences.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005
Review Assistive devices for balance and mobility: benefits, demands, and adverse consequences.
Bateni H, Maki BE. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005 Jan; 86(1):134-45.