
Search
Publication:
abstract
BACKGROUND:
Prospective data on Red and processed meat in relation to risk of subtypes of esophageal and gastric cancer are scarce. We present analyses of association between red and processed meat and The risk of esophageal and gastric cancer subtypes within The Netherlands Cohort Study on Diet and Cancer.Design:120 852 individuals aged 55-69 years were recruited in 1986, and meat intake was assessed using a 150-item food frequency questionnaire. After 16.3 years of follow-up, 107 esophageal squamous cell carcinomas, 145 esophageal adenocarcinomas, 163 gastric cardia adenocarcinomas, 489 gastric non-cardia adenocarcinomas, and 3923 subcohort members were included in a case-cohort analysis.
RESULTS:
Processed as well as red meat intake was positively associated with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in men. Hazard ratios for highest versus lowest quintile of processed and red meat were 3.47 [95% confidence intervals (CI): 1.21-9.94; P for trend: 0.04] and 2.66 (95% CI: 0.94-7.48; P for trend: 0.06), respectively. No association was seen for adenocarcinomas or gastric cancer subtypes or for any of the four subtypes among women.
CONCLUSION:
Our findings suggest that red and processed meat consumption is associated with increased risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in men but not with cancers of other esophageal and gastric subtypes.
Related Articles
Meat consumption and risk of esophageal and gastric cancer in a large prospective study.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2011
Meat consumption and risk of esophageal and gastric cancer in a large prospective study.
Cross AJ, Freedman ND, Ren J, Ward MH, Hollenbeck AR, Schatzkin A, Sinha R, Abnet CC. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011 Mar; 106(3):432-42. Epub 2010 Oct 26.
Meat intake and risk of stomach and esophageal adenocarcinoma within the European Prospective Investigation Into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC).
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006
Meat intake and risk of stomach and esophageal adenocarcinoma within the European Prospective Investigation Into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC).
González CA, Jakszyn P, Pera G, Agudo A, Bingham S, Palli D, Ferrari P, Boeing H, del Giudice G, Plebani M, et al. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006 Mar 1; 98(5):345-54.
Final Report on Carcinogens Background Document for Formaldehyde.
Rep Carcinog Backgr Doc. 2010
Final Report on Carcinogens Background Document for Formaldehyde.
National Toxicology Program. Rep Carcinog Backgr Doc. 2010 Jan; (10-5981):i-512.
Review A review and meta-analysis of red and processed meat consumption and breast cancer.
Nutr Res Rev. 2010
Review A review and meta-analysis of red and processed meat consumption and breast cancer.
Alexander DD, Morimoto LM, Mink PJ, Cushing CA. Nutr Res Rev. 2010 Dec; 23(2):349-65.
Review Meat, fish, and ovarian cancer risk: Results from 2 Australian case-control studies, a systematic review, and meta-analysis.
Am J Clin Nutr. 2010
Review Meat, fish, and ovarian cancer risk: Results from 2 Australian case-control studies, a systematic review, and meta-analysis.
Kolahdooz F, van der Pols JC, Bain CJ, Marks GC, Hughes MC, Whiteman DC, Webb PM, Australian Cancer Study (Ovarian Cancer) and the Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010 Jun; 91(6):1752-63. Epub 2010 Apr 14.
