Publication:


abstract

Brain-computer interfaces (BCI) offer potential for individuals with a variety of motor and sensory disabilities to interact with their environment, communicate and control mobility aids. Two key factors which affect the performance of a BCI and its usability are the feedback given to the participant and the subject's motivation. This paper presents the results from a study investigating the effects of feedback and motivation on the performance of the Strathclyde Brain Computer Interface. The paper discusses how the performance of the system can be improved by behavior integration and Human-in-the-loop design.

Related Articles
The Strathclyde brain computer interface.
Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol So...
The Strathclyde brain computer interface.
Valsan G, Grychtol B, Lakany H, Conway BA. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2009; 2009:606-9.
Neurophysiological predictor of SMR-based BCI performance.
Neuroimage. 2010
Neurophysiological predictor of SMR-based BCI performance.
Blankertz B, Sannelli C, Halder S, Hammer EM, Kübler A, Müller KR, Curio G, Dickhaus T. Neuroimage. 2010 Jul 15; 51(4):1303-9. Epub 2010 Mar 17.
Exploring virtual environments with an EEG-based BCI through motor imagery.
Biomed Tech (Berl). 2005
Exploring virtual environments with an EEG-based BCI through motor imagery.
Leeb R, Scherer R, Keinrath C, Guger C, Pfurtscheller G. Biomed Tech (Berl). 2005 Apr; 50(4):86-91.
Review Brain-computer interfaces for communication and control.
Clin Neurophysiol. 2002
Review Brain-computer interfaces for communication and control.
Wolpaw JR, Birbaumer N, McFarland DJ, Pfurtscheller G, Vaughan TM. Clin Neurophysiol. 2002 Jun; 113(6):767-91.
Review A review of classification algorithms for EEG-based brain-computer interfaces.
J Neural Eng. 2007
Review A review of classification algorithms for EEG-based brain-computer interfaces.
Lotte F, Congedo M, Lécuyer A, Lamarche F, Arnaldi B. J Neural Eng. 2007 Jun; 4(2):R1-R13. Epub 2007 Jan 31.