
Search
Publication:
abstract
Frequent use of emergency department (ED) services is often perceived to be a potentially preventable misuse of resources. The underlying assumption is that similar and more appropriate care can be delivered outside of EDs at a lower cost. To reduce costs and incentivize more appropriate use of services, there have been efforts to design interventions to transition health care utilization of frequent users from EDs to other settings such as outpatient clinics. Many of these efforts have succeeded in smaller trials, but wider use remains elusive for varying reasons. There are also some fundamental problems with the assumption that all or even the majority of frequent ED use is misuse and invoking reasons for that excessive use. These tenuous assumptions become evident when frequent users as a group are compared to less frequent users. Specifically, frequent users tend to have high levels of frequent ED use, have a higher severity of illness, be older, have fewer personal resources, be chronically ill, present for pain-related complaints, and have government insurance (Medicare or Medicaid). Because of the unique characteristics of the population of frequent users, we propose a research agenda that aims to increase the understanding of frequent ED use, by: 1) creating an accepted categorization system for frequent users, 2) predicting which patients are at risk for becoming or remaining frequent users, 3) implementing both ED- and non-ED-based interventions, and 4) conducting qualitative studies of frequent ED users to explore reasons and identify factors that are subject to intervention and explore specific differences among populations by condition, such as mental illness and heart failure.
© 2011 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.
Related Articles
Predictors and outcomes of frequent emergency department users.
Acad Emerg Med. 2003
Predictors and outcomes of frequent emergency department users.
Sun BC, Burstin HR, Brennan TA. Acad Emerg Med. 2003 Apr; 10(4):320-8.
Analysis of costs, length of stay, and utilization of emergency department services by frequent users: implications for health policy.
Acad Emerg Med. 2004
Analysis of costs, length of stay, and utilization of emergency department services by frequent users: implications for health policy.
Ruger JP, Richter CJ, Spitznagel EL, Lewis LM. Acad Emerg Med. 2004 Dec; 11(12):1311-7.
Review Cost reduction strategies for emergency services: insurance role, practice changes and patients accountability.
Health Care Anal. 2009
Review Cost reduction strategies for emergency services: insurance role, practice changes and patients accountability.
Simonet D. Health Care Anal. 2009 Mar; 17(1):1-19. Epub 2008 Feb 28.
A descriptive study of heavy emergency department users at an academic emergency department reveals heavy ED users have better access to care than average users.
J Emerg Nurs. 2005
A descriptive study of heavy emergency department users at an academic emergency department reveals heavy ED users have better access to care than average users.
Blank FS, Li H, Henneman PL, Smithline HA, Santoro JS, Provost D, Maynard AM. J Emerg Nurs. 2005 Apr; 31(2):139-44.
Review Frequent users of emergency departments: the myths, the data, and the policy implications.
Ann Emerg Med. 2010
Review Frequent users of emergency departments: the myths, the data, and the policy implications.
LaCalle E, Rabin E. Ann Emerg Med. 2010 Jul; 56(1):42-8. Epub 2010 Mar 26.
