Home>>Cost-of-illness studies and cost-effectiveness analyses in eating disorders: a systematic review.

Search

About

Authors:
Address: Department of Medical Sociology and Health Economics, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany. n.stuhldreher@uke.de
Journal:


Publication:


abstract

OBJECTIVE:

To review cost-of-illness studies (COIs) and cost-effectiveness analyses (CEAs) of eating disorders (EDs) and to describe their methodological quality.

METHOD:

A systematic literature search was done. Search results passed through a selection process, included studies were classified as COIs, CEAs, or "other cost studies" (OCS). Costs were inflated and converted to 2008 US$ purchasing power parities (PPP). Quality criteria were developed and applied to each study.

RESULTS:

Five COI, two CEA, and eleven "OCS" were reviewed. Most studies focused on anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa. Annual costs per patient ranged from 1,288 to 8,042 US$-PPP. All interventions, investigated in CEA, were more effective and less costly than the alternative treatments.

DISCUSSION:

The number of publications investigating costs in EDs has increased recently. However, no COI provided a comprehensive estimate of costs, and the comparability of CEA was limited. Nonetheless, the results indicate that the costs arising from EDs are substantial.

Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.



Related Articles
Review Cost-of-illness studies and cost-effectiveness analyses in anxiety disorders: a systematic review.
J Affect Disord. 2009
Review Cost-of-illness studies and cost-effectiveness analyses in anxiety disorders: a systematic review.
Konnopka A, Leichsenring F, Leibing E, König HH. J Affect Disord. 2009 Apr; 114(1-3):14-31. Epub 2008 Sep 3.
Review Cost-of-illness studies of depression: a systematic review.
J Affect Disord. 2007
Review Cost-of-illness studies of depression: a systematic review.
Luppa M, Heinrich S, Angermeyer MC, König HH, Riedel-Heller SG. J Affect Disord. 2007 Feb; 98(1-2):29-43. Epub 2006 Sep 6.
Review A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of orlistat in the management of obesity.
Health Technol Assess. 2001
Review A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of orlistat in the management of obesity.
O'Meara S, Riemsma R, Shirran L, Mather L, ter Riet G. Health Technol Assess. 2001; 5(18):1-81.
Review The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of bariatric (weight loss) surgery for obesity: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
Health Technol Assess. 2009
Review The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of bariatric (weight loss) surgery for obesity: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
Picot J, Jones J, Colquitt JL, Gospodarevskaya E, Loveman E, Baxter L, Clegg AJ. Health Technol Assess. 2009 Sep; 13(41):1-190, 215-357, iii-iv.
Review When is critical care medicine cost-effective? A systematic review of the cost-effectiveness literature.
Crit Care Med. 2006
Review When is critical care medicine cost-effective? A systematic review of the cost-effectiveness literature.
Talmor D, Shapiro N, Greenberg D, Stone PW, Neumann PJ. Crit Care Med. 2006 Nov; 34(11):2738-47.