Publication:


abstract

INTRODUCTION:

Diverticular disease of the colon is a common condition in developed countries. For perforated diverticulitis Hartmann's procedure is a safe and quick treatment option. But intestinal restoration needs further interventions. This leads to high complication rates and cost. Therefore a critical evaluation of surgical treatment options is necessary.

METHODS:

During a period of 18 months 88 patients underwent surgical resection for diverticulitis. Forty patients had emergency surgery. Among those a primary anastomosis was performed in 21 patients. The other 19 patients had interval colostomy. Among 21 patients with primary anastomosis major complications occurred in two patients, vs. twelve in patients with Hartmann's operation (p = 0.03). In the Hartmann group eight patients had major general complications, vs. one patient in the group with primary anastomosis (p = 0.06). The mean hospital stay was 38 days after Hartmann's procedure, vs. 13 days for patients with primary anastomosis (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION:

In emergency surgery for Complicated diverticulitis primary anastomosis is not associated with an increased postoperative morbidity. A primary anastomosis reduces the need for further surgical interventions and complex re-operations. Thus, an overall reduction of morbidity, cost, complication rate and hospital stay is possible. Therefore this technique is advantageous for patients and hospitals.

Related Articles
One-stage sigmoid colon resection for perforated sigmoid diverticulitis (Hinchey stages III and IV).
World J Surg. 2006
One-stage sigmoid colon resection for perforated sigmoid diverticulitis (Hinchey stages III and IV).
Richter S, Lindemann W, Kollmar O, Pistorius GA, Maurer CA, Schilling MK. World J Surg. 2006 Jun; 30(6):1027-32.
Review [Value of Hartmann's operation as an emergency intervention in sigmoid diverticulitis].
Swiss Surg. 1997
Review [Value of Hartmann's operation as an emergency intervention in sigmoid diverticulitis].
Röthlin M, Rietschi G, Largiadèr F. Swiss Surg. 1997; 3(3):107-11.
Primary vs. secondary anastomosis after sigmoid colon resection for perforated diverticulitis (Hinchey Stage III and IV): a prospective outcome and cost analysis.
Dis Colon Rectum. 2001
Primary vs. secondary anastomosis after sigmoid colon resection for perforated diverticulitis (Hinchey Stage III and IV): a prospective outcome and cost analysis.
Schilling MK, Maurer CA, Kollmar O, Büchler MW. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001 May; 44(5):699-703; discussion 703-5.
Restoration of bowel continuity after surgery for acute perforated diverticulitis: should Hartmann's procedure be considered a one-stage procedure?
Colorectal Dis. 2009
Restoration of bowel continuity after surgery for acute perforated diverticulitis: should Hartmann's procedure be considered a one-stage procedure?
Vermeulen J, Coene PP, Van Hout NM, van der Harst E, Gosselink MP, Mannaerts GH, Weidema WF, Lange JF. Colorectal Dis. 2009 Jul; 11(6):619-24. Epub 2008 Aug 21.
Review Primary anastomosis or Hartmann's procedure for patients with diverticular peritonitis? A systematic review.
Dis Colon Rectum. 2004
Review Primary anastomosis or Hartmann's procedure for patients with diverticular peritonitis? A systematic review.
Salem L, Flum DR. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004 Nov; 47(11):1953-64.