Publication:


abstract

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate the impact of the open and endoscopic skull base surgery performed by the same team on patients' quality of life.

DESIGN:

Retrospective survey.

SETTING:

University-affiliated medical center.

PATIENTS:

The study included 78 patients who underwent surgery for removal of skull base neoplasms through an expanded endoscopic (n = 41) or a subcranial (n = 37) approach.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE:

A multidimensional, disease-specific questionnaire with 36 items was used. Six relevant domains of QOL were assessed: role of performance, physical functioning, vitality, pain, specific symptoms, and impact on emotions.

RESULTS:

There were no significant clinical or demographic differences between the 2 study groups (P > .06). Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that patients who underwent endoscopic surgery reported significantly better scores in the physical function and impact on emotions domains than the patients who underwent subcranial surgery (P < .04). Analysis of the minimal clinically important difference revealed that these differences were clinically significant.

CONCLUSION:

In certain domains, quality of life after endoscopic skull base surgery appears to be better than that after open approaches.

Related Articles
Quality of life following surgery for anterior skull base tumors.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Sur...
Quality of life following surgery for anterior skull base tumors.
Gil Z, Abergel A, Spektor S, Cohen JT, Khafif A, Shabtai E, Fliss DM. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003 Dec; 129(12):1303-9.
Development of a cancer-specific anterior skull base quality-of-life questionnaire.
J Neurosurg. 2004
Development of a cancer-specific anterior skull base quality-of-life questionnaire.
Gil Z, Abergel A, Spektor S, Shabtai E, Khafif A, Fliss DM. J Neurosurg. 2004 May; 100(5):813-9.
Review The clinical importance of quality-of-life scores in patients with skull base tumors: a meta-analysis and review of the literature.
Curr Oncol Rep. 2012
Review The clinical importance of quality-of-life scores in patients with skull base tumors: a meta-analysis and review of the literature.
Amit M, Abergel A, Fliss DM, Gil Z. Curr Oncol Rep. 2012 Apr; 14(2):175-81.
Patient, caregiver, and surgeon perceptions of quality of life following anterior skull base surgery.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Sur...
Patient, caregiver, and surgeon perceptions of quality of life following anterior skull base surgery.
Gil Z, Abergel A, Spektor S, Khafif A, Fliss DM. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004 Nov; 130(11):1276-81.
Review The endoscope-assisted ventral approach compared with open microscope-assisted surgery for clival chordomas.
World Neurosurg. 2011
Review The endoscope-assisted ventral approach compared with open microscope-assisted surgery for clival chordomas.
Komotar RJ, Starke RM, Raper DM, Anand VK, Schwartz TH. World Neurosurg. 2011 Sep-Oct; 76(3-4):318-27; discussion 259-62.