Home>>Breast MRI utilization in older patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer.

Search

About

Authors:
Address: Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-7050, USA. Csommer@email.unc.edu
Journal:


Publication:
Free Text: Breast MRI utilization in older patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer.


abstract

BACKGROUND:

Recently, use of advanced imaging modalities, such as MRI, has increased dramatically. One novel but still evolving use for MRI is in the diagnosis and clinical staging of newly diagnosed breast cancer patients. Compared with mammography, MRI is more sensitive, but less specific, and far more expensive. The purpose of this study is to examine the prevalence and predictors of MRI use for clinical staging in older women with newly diagnosed breast cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

SEER-Medicare data were used to identify incident breast cancer cases between 2003 and 2005. Outpatient Medicare claims data were queried for receipt of breast MRI. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to examine associations between receiving MRI and patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and SEER region.

RESULTS:

A total of 46,824 patients with breast cancer met inclusion criteria. MRI use increased from 3.9% of women diagnosed in 2003 to 10.1% of women diagnosed in 2005. In the bivariate analyses race, urban/rural location, SEER region, poverty level, education level, stage, surgery type, and tumor size were all significantly associated with receipt of MRI. In the multivariate analysis, those who were younger, white, living in more metropolitan areas, and living in wealthier areas were more likely to receive MRI. There was substantial variability in odds of MRI among different SEER regions.

CONCLUSIONS:

Breast MRI for patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer in the SEER-Medicare population is increasingly common. Ongoing examination of the dissemination of technology is critical to understanding current practice patterns and to the development and implementation of future guidelines.

Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.



Related Articles
Surgeon characteristics and receipt of adjuvant radiotherapy in women with breast cancer.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008
Surgeon characteristics and receipt of adjuvant radiotherapy in women with breast cancer.
Hershman DL, Buono D, McBride RB, Tsai WY, Joseph KA, Grann VR, Jacobson JS. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 Feb 6; 100(3):199-206. Epub 2008 Jan 29.
Mammography use, breast cancer stage at diagnosis, and survival among older women.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000
Mammography use, breast cancer stage at diagnosis, and survival among older women.
McCarthy EP, Burns RB, Freund KM, Ash AS, Shwartz M, Marwill SL, Moskowitz MA. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000 Oct; 48(10):1226-33.
Evaluation of three algorithms to identify incident breast cancer in Medicare claims data.
Health Serv Res. 2007
Evaluation of three algorithms to identify incident breast cancer in Medicare claims data.
Gold HT, Do HT. Health Serv Res. 2007 Oct; 42(5):2056-69.
Review Magnetic resonance imaging screening of the contralateral breast in women with newly diagnosed breast cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of incremental cancer detection and impact on surgical management.
J Clin Oncol. 2009
Review Magnetic resonance imaging screening of the contralateral breast in women with newly diagnosed breast cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of incremental cancer detection and impact on surgical management.
Brennan ME, Houssami N, Lord S, Macaskill P, Irwig L, Dixon JM, Warren RM, Ciatto S. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Nov 20; 27(33):5640-9. Epub 2009 Oct 5.
Review Review of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in breast cancer: should MRI be performed on all women with newly diagnosed, early stage breast cancer?
CA Cancer J Clin. 2009
Review Review of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in breast cancer: should MRI be performed on all women with newly diagnosed, early stage breast cancer?
Houssami N, Hayes DF. CA Cancer J Clin. 2009 Sep-Oct; 59(5):290-302. Epub 2009 Aug 13.